Long-term analysis of children with metastatic neuroblastoma treated in the ENSG5 randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The European Neuroblastoma Study Group 5 (ENSG5) trial showed that time-intensive "rapid" induction chemotherapy (COJEC) was superior to "standard" 3-weekly chemotherapy for children with high-risk metastatic neuroblastoma. Long-term outcomes of the ENSG5 trial were analysed. PROCEDURE: Patients with metastatic neuroblastoma aged ≥12 months were randomly assigned to "standard" or "rapid" induction, receiving the same chemotherapy drugs and doses. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed and prognostic factors evaluated. Amongst patients surviving >5 years, a population of children with persistent metastatic disease after the end of treatment was identified and described. RESULTS: Ten-year EFS was 18.2% (95% confidence interval: 12.2-25.2) for the "standard" arm and 26.8% (19.5-34.7) for the "rapid" arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, P = 0.28). Ten-year OS for the "standard" arm was 19.7% (13.4-26.8) and 28.3% (20.8-36.2) for the "rapid arm" (HR 0.83, P = 0.19). There was a trend for worse EFS and OS for patients having MYCN amplification (HR 1.37 and 1.40, respectively) and those with partial and mixed response to induction (HR 1.69 and 1.75 for EFS and 1.66 and 2.00 for OS, respectively). Among 69 patients who survived >5 years, six had persistent metastatic disease after the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: The benefit of the "rapid" induction regimen seems to be maintained in the long term, although the small number of survivors could justify the lack of statistical significance. MYCN amplification and poor metastatic response to induction could be associated with worse outcomes. A small group of patients with persistent metastatic disease that survived long term has been described.

Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System.

PURPOSE: Treatment and prognosis of pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have improved dramatically in the last 30 years. However, the St Jude NHL staging classification for pediatric NHL was developed more than 35 years ago. The most recent Lugano lymphoma staging classification focused on adult lymphoma. Furthermore, major limitations of the current pediatric NHL staging classification include lack of consideration of new distinct pediatric NHL histologic entities; absence of recognition of frequent skin, bone, kidney, ovarian, and other organ involvement; and lack of newer precise methods to detect bone marrow and CNS involvement, minimal disease quantification, and highly sensitive imaging technologies. METHODS: An international multidisciplinary expert panel convened in Frankfurt, Germany, in 2009 at the Third International Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult NHL Symposium to develop a revised international pediatric NHL staging system (IPNHLSS), addressing limitations of the current pediatric NHL staging system and creating a revised classification. Evidence-based disease distribution and behavior were reviewed from multiple pediatric cooperative group NHL studies. RESULTS: A revised IPNHLSS was developed incorporating new histologic entities, extranodal dissemination, improved diagnostic methods, and advanced imaging technology. CONCLUSION: This revised IPNHLSS will facilitate more precise staging for children and adolescents with NHL and facilitate comparisons of efficacy across different treatment strategies, various institutions, multicenter trials, and cooperative groups by allowing for reproducible pediatric-based staging at diagnosis and relapse.

International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Response Criteria.

PURPOSE: Response criteria are well established for adult patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A revised set of response criteria in adults with NHL was recently published. However, NHL in children and adolescents involves different histologies, primary sites of disease, patterns of metastatic spread, approaches to therapy, and responses to treatment compared with adult NHL. However, there are no standardized response criteria specific to pediatric NHL. Therefore, we developed international standardized methods for assessing response to therapy in children and adolescents with NHL. METHODS: An international multidisciplinary group of pediatric oncologists, pathologists, biologists, and radiologists convened during and after the Third and Fourth International Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult NHL Symposia to review existing response and outcome data, develop methods for response evaluation that reflect incorporation of more sensitive technologies currently in use, and incorporate primary and metastatic sites of disease for the evaluation of therapeutic response in children and adolescents with NHL. RESULTS: Using the current adult NHL response criteria as a starting point, international pediatric NHL response criteria were developed incorporating both contemporary diagnostic imaging and pathology techniques, including novel molecular and flow cytometric technologies used for the determination of minimal residual disease. CONCLUSION: Use of the international pediatric NHL response criteria in children and adolescents receiving therapy for NHL incorporates data obtained from new and more sensitive technologies that are now being widely used for disease evaluation, providing a standardized means for reporting treatment response.

Long-term follow-up of children with high-risk neuroblastoma: the ENSG5 trial experience.

BACKGROUND: Therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma is intensive and multimodal, and significant long-term adverse effects have been described. The aim of this study was to identify the nature and severity of late complications of metastatic neuroblastoma survivors included in the ENSG5 clinical trial. PROCEDURE: The trial protocol included induction chemotherapy (randomized "Standard" OPEC/OJEC vs. "Rapid" COJEC), surgery of primary tumor and high-dose melphalan with stem cell rescue. Two hundred and sixty-two children were randomized, 69 survived >5 years, and 57 were analyzed. Data were obtained from the ENSG5 trial database and verified with questionnaires sent to participating centers. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12.9 (6.9-16.5) years. No differences were found in late toxicities between treatment arms. Twenty-eight children (49.1%) developed hearing loss. Nine patients (15.8%) developed glomerular filtration rate <80 ml/min/1.73 m(2), but no cases of chronic renal failure were documented. Endocrine complications (28.1% of children) included mainly hypogonadism and delayed growth. Four children developed second malignancies, three of them 5 years after diagnosis: one osteosarcoma, one carcinoma of the parotid gland and one ependymoma. There were no hematological malignancies or deaths in remission. CONCLUSIONS: This study analyzed a wide cohort of high-risk neuroblastoma survivors from a multi-institutional randomized trial and established the profile of long-term toxicity within the setting of an international clinical trial.

Long-term outcome for immune suppression and immune related lymphoproliferative disorder: prospective data from the United Kingdom Children's Leukaemia and Cancer Group registry 1994-2004.

Prospective national registry data on 98 patients were studied to determine the long-term outcome of immune related lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) and define prognostic factors. Seventy-three developed LPD following organ transplant (26 liver, 21 heart, 15 kidney, nine bone marrow [BM], two bowel). Twenty-five had non-transplant related immunosuppression. Age was 1.1-17 years (median 8.6). Fifty-eight patients had lymphomatous, 21 systemic and 17 lymphadenopathic disease. Sixty (73%) were disseminated and 22 (27%) localized. Thirty-three (54%) were monoclonal. Seventy-three (83%) were Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive. Median follow-up was 7.6 years. LPD developed earlier after liver and BM as compared to heart or kidney transplant. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 58%. Prognosis was best after liver and kidney transplant (OS >77%). Mortality was higher following heart (2.5 times) and BM transplant (5 times). Adverse prognostic factors were disseminated or lymphomatous disease and lack of reduction of immunosuppression. With appropriate reduction of immunosuppression, rituximab and low-dose chemotherapy, long-term survival is high.

Randomised controlled trials of palliative care - a survey of the views of advanced cancer patients and their relatives.

PURPOSE: To determine if patients with advanced cancer are interested in participation in palliative care research, particularly RCTs, and the importance of demographic factors in decision making. It sought relatives' views towards supporting trial entry, and assessed if demographic factors can predict participation. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed through multiprofessional focus groups, patient and relative interviews and pilot studies. Consecutive patients known by the palliative care service to have advanced disease were approached. Relatives of consenting patients completed a parallel survey. K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate between those willing and unwilling to participate. Multivariate logistic regression identified demographic factors predicting willingness. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients and 100 relatives were included. 92% of patients would participate in studies involving simple interventions, whereas only 26% would consider studies of complex interventions. A similar pattern was observed for relative support. Over 75% of participants expressed altruistic views. Concepts of 'randomisation', 'placebo-control' and 'blinding' deterred about one-half. Many were prepared to complete short questionnaires, accept extra medications, investigations, hospital visits or admissions within a trial context but the possibility of side-effects was a major deterrent. Patient age was the only significant predictor of willingness to participate, with older patients less likely to participate. CONCLUSION: Despite the likely absence of individual benefit, many patients appear willing to participate in palliative care research. Trial design and the possibility of side-effects proved very influential in their decision making. Clinical trials in palliative care are more likely to be successful if developed in accordance with the views of patients and their relatives.

High-dose rapid and standard induction chemotherapy for patients aged over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma includes initial induction chemotherapy with a 21-day interval between induction treatments. We aimed to assess whether an intensive chemotherapy protocol that had a 10-day interval between treatments would improve event-free survival (EFS) in patients aged 1 year or over with high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: Between Oct 30, 1990, and March 18, 1999, patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma who had not received previous chemotherapy were enrolled from 29 centres in Europe. Patients were randomly assigned to rapid treatment (cisplatin [C], vincristine [O], carboplatin [J], etoposide [E], and cyclophosphamide [C], known as COJEC) or standard treatment (vincristine [O], cisplatin [P], etoposide [E], and cyclophosphamide [C], ie, OPEC, alternated with vincristine [O], carboplatin [J], etoposide [E], and cyclophosphamide [C], ie, OJEC). Both regimens used the same total cumulative doses of each drug (except vincristine), but the dose intensity of the rapid regimen was 1.8-times higher than that of the standard regimen. The standard regimen was given every 21 days if patients showed haematological recovery, whereas the rapid regimen was given every 10 days irrespective of haematological recovery. Response to chemotherapy was assessed according to the conventional International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). In responders, surgical excision of the primary tumour was attempted, followed by myeloablation (with 200 mg/m2 of melphalan) and haemopoietic stem-cell rescue. Primary endpoints were 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year EFS. Data were analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the US National Cancer Institute website, number NCT00365755, and also as EU-20592 and CCLG-NB-1990-11. FINDINGS: 262 patients, of median age 2.95 years (range 1.03-20.97), were randomly assigned-132 patients to standard and 130 patients to rapid treatment. 111 patients in the standard group and 109 patients in the rapid group completed chemotherapy. Chemotherapy doses were recorded for 123 patients in the standard group and 126 patients in the rapid group. 97 of 123 (79%) patients in the standard group and 84 of 126 (67%) patients in the rapid group received at least 90% of the scheduled chemotherapy, and the relative dose intensity was 1.94 compared with the standard regimen. 3-year EFS was 24.2% for patients in the standard group and 31.0% for those in the rapid group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.14], p=0.30. 5-year EFS was 18.2% in the standard group and 30.2% in the rapid group, representing a difference of 12.0% (1.8 to 22.3), p=0.022. 10-year EFS was 18.2% in the standard group and 27.1% in the rapid group, representing a difference of 8.9% (-1.2 to 19.0), p=0.085. Myeloablation was given a median of 55 days earlier in patients assigned rapid treatment than those assigned standard treatment. Infective complications (numbers of patients with febrile neutropenia and septicaemia, and if given, time on antibiotic and antifungal treatment) and time in hospital were greater with rapid treatment. Occurrence of fungal infection was the same in both regimens. INTERPRETATION: Dose intensity can be increased with a rapid induction regimen in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. There was no significant difference in OS between the rapid and standard regimens at 5 years and 10 years. However, an increasing difference in EFS after 3 years suggests that the efficacy of the rapid regimen is better than the standard regimen. A rapid induction regimen enables myeloablation to be given much earlier, which might contribute to a better outcome.

Efficacy and tolerability of high-dose methotrexate in central nervous system positive or relapsed lymphoproliferative disease following liver transplant in children.

Childhood post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a heterogeneous condition in which treatment varies, from the reduction of immunosuppression to moderately intensive chemotherapy. While low-dose chemotherapy/rituximab has been found to be effective, moderately intensive chemotherapy is required for patients who relapse, have classic non-Hodgkin lymphoma or have fulminant PTLD. Methotrexate (Mtx) is highly effective in lymphomas and crosses the blood-brain barrier. However, there are no data in the literature regarding its safety in post-liver transplant patients. We describe four cases of high-grade lymphomas (three diffuse large B cell and one T-cell lymphoblastic), post-liver transplant, for which chemotherapy including high-dose Mtx (HDMTX) was the treatment of choice. In total, 20 doses of HDMTX (1-5 g/m(2)) were given. The treatment was well tolerated and all four patients had a good response. One case of central nervous system (CNS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was treated with HDMTX alone. We conclude that, in the absence of significant organ damage, HDMTX can safely be given to liver transplant patients, but should only be administered in specialist oncology units. Proof of effectiveness as a single agent in CNS lymphoma needs further studies.

Results of a randomized international study of high-risk central nervous system B non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents.

The prognosis for higher risk childhood B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma has improved over the past 20 years but the optimal intensity of treatment has yet to be determined. Children 21 years old or younger with newly diagnosed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma/B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-NHL/B-ALL) with higher risk factors (bone marrow [BM] with or without CNS involvement) were randomized to standard intensity French-American-British/Lymphoma Malignancy B (FAB/LMB) therapy or reduced intensity (reduced cytarabine plus etoposide and deletion of 3 maintenance courses M2, M3, M4). All patients with CNS disease had additional high-dose methotrexate (8 g/m2) plus extra intrathecal therapy. Fifty-one percent had BM involvement, 20% had CNS involvement, and 29% had BM and CNS involvement. One hundred ninety patients were randomized. The probabilities of 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and survival (S) were 79% +/- 2.7% and 82% +/- 2.6%, respectively. In patients in remission after 3 cycles who were randomized to standard versus reduced-intensity therapy, the 4-year EFS after randomization was 90% +/- 3.1% versus 80% +/- 4.2% (one-sided P = .064) and S was 93% +/- 2.7% versus 83% +/- 4.0% (one-sided P = .032). Patients with either combined BM/CNS disease at diagnosis or poor response to cyclophosphamide, Oncovin [vincristine], prednisone (COP) reduction therapy had a significantly inferior EFS and S (P < .001). Standard-intensity FAB/LMB therapy is recommended for children with high-risk B-NHL (B-ALL with or without CNS involvement).

Outcome after autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory childhood Hodgkin disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcome and prognostic factors for overall survival in children with recurrent and/or primary refractory Hodgkin disease (HD) after high-dose therapy and autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The survival outcome of this treatment was compared with conventional salvage therapy without stem cell transplantation. METHODS: Clinical records of 51 patients with relapsed or refractory HD who underwent AHSCT were reviewed. The source of the stem cells was bone marrow (n = 22) or peripheral blood (n = 29). At the time of high-dose therapy, 39 patients were in complete remission and 1 was in partial remission, while the remaining 11 had refractory disease. The records of 78 patients from the HD 1 trial who underwent conventional salvage treatment but without AHSCT for relapsed or refractory HD were also reviewed. All patients received HDT without radiation for conditioning. RESULTS: Overall survival from diagnosis of patients treated with AHSCT did not differ significantly from that of those treated with conventional salvage therapy (hazard ratio = 1.5; 95% confidence interval = 0.9-8.2; P = 0.4). There were also no statistically significant differences in survival data between the two approaches for patients whose duration of first remission was less than or greater than 1 year (P = 0.5; stratified log-rank). Of the 11 patients who received AHSCT for refractory disease, 9 remain alive and well with followups ranging from 2 to 18 years. No deaths due to treatment-related complications were seen in the AHSCT group. CONCLUSIONS: Stem cell transplantation does not offer any significant survival advantage over conventional salvage therapy in children with relapsed HD, although it may be of benefit for patients with primary refractory disease.

Rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) for the management of hyperuricemia in patients with cancer: report of an international compassionate use study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) are serious complications that can occur during chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies, even if standard management procedures, including administration of allopurinol, are undertaken. Rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase that converts uric acid (UA) into the soluble compound allantoin, has been shown to control hyperuricemia faster and more reliably than allopurinol.(1) METHODS: A compassionate use trial, running from January 1999 to December 2001, provided access to rasburicase for patients in nine countries who were at risk for TLS during the initiation of chemotherapy. Of the 280 patients enrolled in the study, 278 received rasburicase and were included in the analysis. A total of 166 pediatric patients who had leukemia (approximately 74%), lymphoma (approximately 24%), or solid tumors (approximately 3%) were treated with rasburicase. One hundred twelve adults with either leukemia (68%) or lymphoma (30%) also were treated. Rasburicase (0.20 mg/kg) was administered intravenously once a day for 1 to 7 days, at the investigator's discretion. Two doses daily could be administered during the first 3 days. A response was defined as a reduction in UA level or maintenance of a UA level less than 7.5 mg/dL (or less than 6.5 mg/dL, for children age < 13 years). RESULTS: UA levels at 24-48 hours after administration of the last dose of rasburicase were available for 122 pediatric patients and 97 adult patients. The mean UA level in 29 hyperuricemic children decreased from 15.1 mg/dL to 0.4 mg/dL, whereas in 27 hyperuricemic adults, the mean level decreased from 14.2 mg/dL to 0.5 mg/dL. Prophylactic administration of rasburicase to prevent TLS during chemotherapy reduced UA levels from a mean of 4.4 mg/dL to 0.8 mg/dL in 93 nonhyperuricemic children and from 4.8 mg/dL to 0.4 mg/dL in 70 nonhyperuricemic adults (for all reductions in UA levels, P < 0.001). The response rate was 100%. Rasburicase was very well tolerated. Serious adverse events related to rasburicase were observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirm that rasburicase is safe and highly effective in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced hyperuricemia in both children and adults.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma in childhood: analysis of 72 patients treated on The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group chemotherapy regimens.

From June 1990 to June 1998, 72 patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) were treated with short intensive multi-agent regimens [non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) 9000 and 9602]. Diagnosis was based on morphological and immunophenotypic criteria. Treatment for stage I disease consisted of eight courses (2 x vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisolone; 2 x methotrexate; 2 x cytarabine, thioguanine; and 2 x methotrexate etoposide). For stage II, III and non-central nervous system (CNS) stage IV, two COPADM (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisolone, methotrexate, vincristine), two CYM (cytarabine methotrexate) and a COPADM was given. For CNS-positive disease, treatment was intensified and contained methotrexate 8 g/m(2) and cytarabine 3 g/m(2). Fifty-nine patients (82%) achieved a remission. Thirteen of these relapsed, with a median time to relapse from the start of treatment of 5 months (range 3-14). Relapse included a new site in 9/13 patients. The probabilities of overall and event free survival at 5 years were 65% (53-76%) and 59% (47-70%), respectively, with a median follow up of 4.3 years. Mediastinal and visceral involvement at presentation were found to be predictive of an increased risk of failure.

The measurement of symptoms in young children with cancer: the validation of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in children aged 7-12.

Few studies have attempted to describe the experience of symptoms in young children with cancer. This is due, in part, to the lack of validated symptom assessment scales for this patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a revised Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) in patients aged 7-12 as an instrument for the assessment of symptoms in young children with cancer. The MSAS (7-12) was administered to 149 children (inpatients and outpatients) who were undergoing treatment at either the Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom or The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia. Validity was evaluated by comparison with the medical record, parental report, and concurrent assessment on visual analogue scales for selected symptoms. The data provide evidence of the reliability and validity of MSAS (7-12) and demonstrate that children with cancer as young as 7 years can report clinically relevant and consistent information about their symptom experience. Young children with cancer experience multiple symptoms. Approximately one-third had experienced lethargy and/or pain and/or insomnia during the 48 hours prior to the completion of MSAS (7-12). The completion rate for MSAS (7-12) was high and the majority of children completed the instrument in a short period of time and with little difficulty. The instrument appears to be age appropriate and may be helpful to older children unable to independently complete MSAS (10-18). Systematic symptom assessment may be useful in future epidemiological studies of symptoms and in cancer chemotherapy drug trials.